This chart is not evidence of a global economic slowdown, but of a philosophical shift in the most prosperous and productive country on the planet – the US. The world’s marxist governments, like our current administration, do not want prosperity for their people. A prosperous people are too difficult to control and impossible to make dependent on government.
 |
| From tea parties |
Click the “Tea Parties” link to see the full sized image. National prosperity is found in production not consumption. This chart from the OECD shows a worldwide drop in production at almost 20% in the last 9 months.
Our current administration is not working for the prosperity and freedom of its citizens. They have put policies in place which have Intentionally Created this global slowdown in order to Intentionally Create an environment in which the people will look to the Govt for a solution. The Obama administration is pursuing textbook MARXIST policies.
Hard to believe? First consider the people advising him, those whom he has willingly placed around him:
- Van Jones is self-avowed Communist. He is in the White House and advises the president on matters of economic and social policy.
- Treasury Sec. Timothy Geithner: in an interview in May he stated that Treasury policies are working to “Prevent the next economic boom cycle”
- Bill Ayers is a former terrorist who bombed the pentagon. He is a close friend of the president, and a self avowed marxist who has worked to start a revolutionary war against the United States government in order that capitalist system could be overthrown.(1)
- Political thug Rahm Emanuel sends dead fish to political opponents. He is the President’s Chief of Staff
- Ezekiel Emanuel: Rahm’s brother, a bioethicist and a rabid proponent of state sponsored euthansia. E. Emanuel is writing the national health care bill and advising President Obama on health policy.
- The President’s pastor of 20 years (and I use the term very loosely) Jeremiah Wright believes that “White folks greed runs the world in need.” and that the 9-11 terrorist events were “America’s chickens coming home to roost.”
Therefore, what would proselyte Obama believe was his mission if given the opportunity? You and I are watching the answer unfold before our eyes.
Pres. Obama has stated his view of prosperity is that wealth should be “spread around.” He has stated in political campaign speeches throughout the 90’s and the recent presidential campaign that “The wealth of the nation should be returned to the rightful owners.” Remember Joe the Plumber?
Karl Marx built his political theories on the following maxim: “The government should take from each according to their means, to give (redistribute) to each according to their need” This political ideal will not work in a prosperous economy. A Govt must have its people in need or close to poverty, and then create boiling hot envy between the ‘haves’ and the ‘have nots’ (class warfare) in order for Marxism to be accepted. A prosperous people have no need or tolerance for this kind of oppressive, socially destructive government policies.
If you still have any doubts – take a look at the inner cities of any major urban center for the inevitable outcome of Obama’s Marxist policy: Watts, Detroit, South Central LA, the Bronks, the South side of Chicago, Harlem. Govt welfare policies have created and supported urban neighborhoods such as these. Welfare programs take money from the productive sector of society and redistribute it to the poor. Welfare provides housing, food stamps, free clinics, etc and has done so for more than a generation – an Obama utopian society.
Birds of a feather flock together. If it waddles like a duck and quacks like a duck . . .
Look at the results of social economic redistribution. I ask you – Is this the kind of America you want to live in??
Timothy Burns
Postscript: Supporting the poor in our society is not the problem, and this essay should not be confused with a rant against helping out those less fortunate. The poor will always be among us, and should be cared for by a prosperous, Christian society. A Government that takes money is the problem. Taking wealth that an individual or company has earned through hard work is theft. This action is immoral, under any disguised good intentions. Giving money to those who don’t know how to manage it is equally damaging to the person, and thereby to society. Without teaching stewardship and putting accountability in place to be responsible for the support received, the only possible outcome is a sense of entitlement by those who receive the public assistance, and growing demands for more.
(1) Berger, Dan (2006). Outlaws of America: The Weather Underground and the Politics of Solidarity. AK Press. p. 95.
